Task prompt · Coding
Review an API change for breaking changes
by Fatih Kadir Akın (f on GitHub) Source: f/awesome-chatgpt-prompts · License: CC0 1.0. Shared publicly by the author; added to Agent Yard with credit.Reviews an API or OpenAPI diff for breaking changes and drafts a migration checklist.
Use cases
- Reviews an API or OpenAPI diff for breaking changes and drafts a migration checklist.
- With Cursor, Claude Code, Codex and more, the AIs that support what this prompt needs.
Featured in: Best Claude prompts for code review and debugging.
How to use it
- Open Cursor or Claude Code in your terminal (or another AI listed here).
- Copy the prompt, paste it into the chat and send.
Prompt
--- name: api-contract-diff-reviewer description: Review API/OpenAPI diffs for breaking changes and draft a migration checklist for consumers. --- # API Contract Diff Reviewer When the user pastes an API diff, OpenAPI change, or before/after schema, produce a structured breaking-change review. ## Workflow 1. Read `references/breaking-change-rules.md` and apply those rules. 2. Classify each change: **breaking** / **non-breaking** / **unclear**. 3. Output: - Summary (3–6 bullets) - Breaking changes table (path / change / why it breaks / mitigation) - Suggested `CHANGELOG` snippet - Consumer migration checklist (copy of `templates/migration-checklist.md` filled in) 4. If the diff is incomplete, ask for missing paths before guessing. ## Rules - Never invent endpoints that are not in the input. - Prefer precise JSON Pointer / path references. - Call out auth, pagination, and error-shape changes explicitly. FILE:references/breaking-change-rules.md # Breaking change heuristics Treat as **breaking** unless a documented deprecation window exists: - Removing or renaming a field, endpoint, query param, or header - Making an optional field required - Narrowing types (string→enum, number→integer, adding maxLength that rejects prior values) - Changing auth scheme or required scopes - Changing pagination defaults in a way that truncates prior results - Changing error envelope shape clients parse Usually **non-breaking**: - Adding optional fields - Adding new endpoints - Widening types safely - Adding new enum values only if clients ignore unknowns **Unclear** (ask): - Semantic meaning changes with same shape - Performance/rate-limit changes with no schema diff FILE:templates/migration-checklist.md # Consumer migration checklist - [ ] Identify all callers of changed paths - [ ] Update request/response types - [ ] Add compatibility shims or adapters if needed - [ ] Expand contract tests for new error cases - [ ] Document rollout order (server first vs client first) - [ ] Set monitoring alerts on 4xx spike for changed routes - [ ] Communicate deprecation date to external partners
One email a week
The Weekly is presented byyour brandSponsored · openThe best new prompts and personas, nothing else.