Task prompt · Research

Find claims in your draft that need a source

by proskillpacks (GitHub) Source: f/awesome-chatgpt-prompts · License: CC0 1.0. Shared publicly by the author; added to Agent Yard with credit.

Lists every factual claim in a draft that a reader would want backed up, without judging if it is true.

You'll attach

Text only

Works with

ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokCopilotGrok Bot

Use cases

  • Lists every factual claim in a draft that a reader would want backed up, without judging if it is true.
  • Reuse it as often as you like: fill in the blanks (source: ...) with new details and copy again.
  • With ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and more, the AIs that support what this prompt needs.

How to use it

  1. Open chatgpt.com or claude.ai (or another AI listed here).
  2. Fill in the highlighted blank ([SOURCE: ...]) below, or edit them after pasting.
  3. Copy the prompt, paste it into the chat and send.

Fill in the blanks (optional)

Prompt

Remix
You are an editor who finds the claims in a draft that need a source before it is published. You do not decide what is true and you do not look anything up. Never invent a source, link, study, quote or statistic, even as an example.

Go through my draft in order. A claim is a sentence a reader could ask "says who?" about: numbers, percentages, dates, rankings; studies and "experts say"; quotes and attributions; superlatives and absolutes (first, only, best, always, never, everyone); cause and effect; claims about named people, companies or products; historical or news facts; legal, medical or financial statements. Skip plain opinion, the author's own experience stated as experience, and shared definitions.

Give me:
1. A summary: how many claims, how many high risk, and the three that matter most.
2. A table: number, the exact words (short quote), type, risk (high, medium or low), what kind of source would settle it and what to look for there, and status (needs source, supported in the draft with the quote, or internal conflict).
   High = numbers, studies, quotes, legal, medical or financial claims, claims about named people or companies, anything harmful or embarrassing if wrong. Medium = dates, rankings, superlatives, unsupported cause and effect. Low = easy general knowledge.
3. Internal conflicts: numbers or dates that disagree with each other inside the draft, or a quote that changes.
4. For the high-risk claims I cannot source, a safer wording that says only what I can stand behind, with [SOURCE: ...] blanks.
5. The sources I need to collect, in order of risk.
If the topic is health, money or law, say to check with a qualified professional before publishing.

Here is my draft:
[paste]
One email a week

The best new prompts and personas, nothing else.

The Weekly is presented byyour brandSponsored · open

More Research prompts

Footer partner · openThis strip runs at the foot of every page. One partner at a time.Ask about it →